PORTUGESE RULE AGAINST PCR TESTS AND LOCKDOWNS
COULD MOST OF OUR COVID TESTS HAVE BEEN WRONG?
=====
When a PCR test is done, and the sample run at 35 cycles or more, the result is most often useless and yields a false positive result. At least this is what is claimed by many researchers and medicos. Australia has been using 35 cycles or more but recently this writer noted that the Health Minister, Greg Hunt, said Australian testers would be reducing the cycles. I can't find a link but will keep looking and add it when I find it. Here is an article by Rappoport, but it refers to a Portugese case some months old - but still relevant - and I have an article post from the original date to confirm Rappoport's claims. Mind you, I am sure there will be rebuttals available, but the issue then boils down to "he said, she said", which does not auger well for a sense of certainty in the science.
Historic Portuguese Appeals Court ruling on PCR test
by Jon Rappoport
February 24, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
I’m continuing my series exposing the COVID test fraud. [1]
On November 11, 2020—and ignored completely by major media in the US and other countries—the Lisbon, Portugal, Court of Appeal ruled against lockdowns, because they were based on unreliable PCR tests. [2]
The ruling was historic.
The off-guardian covered the story [2]: “Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests ‘Unreliable’ & Quarantines ‘Unlawful’; Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world”
“Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.”
“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably [a study by Jaafar et al], which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.”
“The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”
The Court was declaring the PCR test alone could not be sufficient for a diagnosis of disease, and it was outrageous to believe it could.
A “case of COVID disease” without a medical assessment of clinical symptoms in the patient is no case at all. It is a misnomer, and, the Court stated, represents a serious breach of the law.
I have explained the issue of “cycles” before. Each cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the test sample swabbed from the patient. When 35 or more cycles are deployed (some reports say 25), the result of the test is meaningless.
However, many, many labs use 40 or even 45 cycles.
At more than 35 cycles, the test yields an overwhelming percentage of false-positives.
This Portuguese Court of Appeal is surely the best “COVID-educated” judicial body in the world.
In prior articles on the PCR, I’ve exposed a triangle of factors that surrounds COVID testing in the US.
One: Anthony Fauci readily asserts that running the test at 35 cycles or higher yields useless and meaningless results. [3]
Two: However, the FDA and the CDC recommend performing the test at up to 40 cycles. Therefore, US labs will comply—turning out millions of tests that are useless, BUT WHICH FALSELY STATE THE PATIENT IS INFECTED. [4] [4a] [4b]
Three: And the NY Times reports that labs in the US never reveal, to doctor or patient, how many cycles they are deploying. [5]
That’s a recipe for cooking up a false pandemic.
SOURCE: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/24/historic-portuguese-appeals-court-ruling-on-pcr-test/
AN ORIGINAL ARTICLE.........How many cycles are used in Australia?
https://www.sabhlokcity.com/2020/11/pcr-testing-how-many-cycles-are-used-in-australia/
19th November 2020
PCR testing – how many cycles are used in Australia?
We know that anything over 25 cycles is a pile of crap. It doesn’t have any diagnostic validity whatsoever (even assuming that PCR test are not measuring something other than SARS-Cov2).
So how many cycles in Australia? This question has come up quite a bit.
Page 4 of this government document states that “Each amplification reaction is known as a cycle, and usually 35-45 cycles are undertaken.”
Doherty Institute recommends 38 or more.
Comments
Post a Comment