THINGS YOU CAN'T SAY ABOUT THE TEST

 


This is a re-blog from Lew Rockwell's site which published one of Jon Rappoport's many op-eds on the "virus". Both sites are now banned [along with most other US sites] by facebook in Australia as part of their differences with the Australian Government. Even so, Rappoport's material is banned normally because he offers opinions about the "pandemic" which contradict the zeitgeist. Our own blog has not been picked up as an enemy by facebook algorithms as yet, so here we go.........



As I’ve been telling readers for many months, even if you assume SARS-CoV-2 is real, the test is useful, and the case and death numbers are meaningful, there are vast and crippling internal contradictions within the official portrait of COVID-19.

Currently, I’m focusing on the PCR test and its fatal flaws.

The test is a MAJOR weak point in the enemy’s attack on humanity. If the test falls, the case and death numbers are shown to be wildly false, and the whole pandemic narrative collapses.

I urge readers to spread this information far and wide.

On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a long article headlined, “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [1] [2]

Its main message? “The standard [COVID PCR] tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus…Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”Buy New $29.99(as of 02:03 EST - Details)

“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

“On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.”

TAKEAWAY FROM THE Times: Up to 90% of ALL people who have been labeled “COVID cases” are not COVID cases. This fact would downgrade the pandemic to “just another flu season.” And there would be no reason for lockdowns.

Of course, the Times goes on to say the solution to this problem is MORE TESTING. Only a moron would accept that notion.

The enduring message of their article still stands: the PCR test apparatus is a fraud, through and through. It enables the recording of monumentally false case numbers, which are used to declare unnecessary lockdowns and wall-to-wall economic destruction.

Make the truth known.


SOURCES:

[1] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210217055535/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.

SOURCE: https://www.lewrockwell .com/2021/02/jon-rappoport/yes-the-ny-times-exposed-the-pcr-test/

Comments

POPULAR

THE NEW WORLD GREEN RELIGION GOES PAGAN & COMMUNIST

HACKERS UNCOVER DISTURBING NEWS ON THE "JAB"

CAN THE CDC BE TRUSTED?

THE LODGE, KABBALAH and RITUAL ABUSE [ in Sth. Australia]

REPORTS to Feb22: COVID ADVERSE REACTIONS

YOUR NEW V4X PASSPORT IS COMING and already in Israel

WORLD COUNCIL of CHURCHES OFFENDS THE FOREVER OFFENDED